WHP CRUISE SUMMARY INFORMATION WOCE section designation A21, S04, SR02 Expedition designation (EXPOCODE) 06MT11_5 Chief Scientist(s) and their affiliation Wolfgang Roether, UB Dates 1990.01.23 - 1990.03.08 Ship METEOR Ports of call Ushuaia to Cape Town Number of stations 79 Geographic boundaries of the stations 41°57.90''S 68°15.80''W 18°27.00''E 63°10.60''S Floats and drifters deployed 10 Floats Moorings deployed or recovered none Contributing Authors none listed Chief Scientist's Cruise Report to WOCE WHP METEOR cruise 11/5 Ushuaia to Cape Town Jan. 23 to Mar. 8, 1990 Chief Scientist: Dr. W. Roether Universitat Bremen Fachbereich 1 PO Box 330440 2800 Bremen 23 Germany Tel: 049-421-218-3551/2503 TLX: 245811 Fax: 049-421-218-3601 E-Mail: W.ROETHER/Omnet Funding:Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Bundesministerium fur Forschung und Technologie, Bonn, Germany Description of scientific program: The cruise did WOCE WHP sections S1/A21 (Drake Passage) and S2/A12 (passage south of Africa; incomplete), with full tracer coverage. Additional work was carried out in the northern Weddell Sea. Taken together this work at the same time completed the SAVE field work, and by this the large-volume WOCE tracer work in the Atlantic sector. Fig. 1 gives the cruise track and Table 1 some basics for the cruise. Table 2 lists the measurements taken and the PI's responsible. A list of participants is given in Table 3. An account of the cruise (in German, including all 5 legs of cruise no. 11) has been given to Roether et al. (1990). Basic cruise funding came from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, Bonn, Germany. Table 1: METEOR Cruise No. 11, Leg 5 leave Ushuaia January 23, 1990 return for winch repair Feb. 2-3, 1990 enter Cape Town Mar. 8, 1990 scientists 30 crew 32 master Henning Papenhagen stations 79 tracers full suite WOCE sections S1/A21, S2/A12 Description of stations The work was limited by the available ship time. The two WOCE sections and in particular the Drake Passage section were given highest priority. On S2/A12 about 60nm station spacing was achieved. The work in between consisted of a short section north and east of the South Orkney Islands, in order to cross a possible deep-water outflow from the Weddell Sea, as well as boundary flow at the northern margin of the Weddell Basin. Furthermore, a section was obtained from the South Sandwich Trench eastward up to the African Passage section, crossing the deep outflow through the trench as well as a possible north-south exchange across the American-Antarctic Ridge. Sta. 149 (Fig. 1) reoccupied Sta. 234 of WWSP 86, and, nearly, GEOSECS station 89'. WWSP 86 (Huber et al., 1989), that likewise included small and large-volume tracers, may be taken as the southward extension of our African passage section southward to the Antarctic continent. The Drake Passage section was placed westward of the "classical" ones (Sievers and Nowlin, 1984). While this coincided with the section as indicated in the WOCE implementation Plan, the idea behind was to stay west of major deep topography, in order to characterize the waters inflowing from the Pacific and minimum admixture from the Atlantic sector. As the Polar Front bends southward around the South Shetlands, our choice meant a rather wide Polar Frontal Zone. As for the passage south of Africa, we attempted to stay west of the Agulhas Retroflexion, and to follow the deep topography in order to enable characterization of deep and bottom waters in the Agulhas and Cape Basins. This resulted in crossing the ACC at least than 90 degrees, so that the fronts in our section appear as rather more gradual (cf. Witworth and Nowlin, 1987), as well as in some curvature in the track. The part east of the South Sandwich trench was placed just north of the axis of the Antarctic American Ridge. METEOR entered Ushuaia Jan. 20, 1990 and installation of equipment started immediately. Some gear was found to be stuck at Buenos Aires, but finally reached the ship in time before departure. METEOR left Ushuaia on the morning of Jan. 23, 1990. We managed to start station work across Drake Passage already the next morning, following a trial station immediately after laving the Beagle Channel. The section started SW of Cape Horn on the shelf, and continued south at 30nm spacing. Basic equipment was a Neil Brown Mark IIIB CTD (AWI, calibrated at Scripps ODF) and a 24 x 12 liter GO Rosette system. A special cast was carried out to check for CFM sampling blanks, which were found to be vanishingly small except for a certain set of Niskin bottles that we consequently avoided to use. Large-volume stations (Fig. 1) were placed between the fronts so as to characterize the four principle hydrographic zones of the passage (Sievers and Nowlin, 1984). Apart from PCO2 which became operative only toward the end of the section, all measurements were carried out successfully. Salinity, nutrient and oxygen measurements were made in standard fashion. 14C, 39Ar and 85Kr sample processing used the Heidelberg vacuum extraction system, and Ra processing the Princeton procedures. TOT-CO2 and PCO2 measurement was coulometric. The CFM equipment employed was an automated system based on the Weiss and Bullister design (Bullister and Weiss, 1988). It was in routine use at sea for the first time, which led to some modification of procedures during the cruise. The section was accompanied by XBT drops at 10nm spacing, and thermosalinograph readings were obtained continuously. We also ran the ship's ADCP, together with calibration runs. Quality of the ADCP data is open at this stage, and only partial GPS availability was a drawback. Floats and drifters deployed A total of 10 prototype ALACE floats were deployed north of the Polar Front. Deployment was found to be straightforward, and 8 of the instruments, which were set at 750 m depth and fortnightly surfacing, have operated perfectly since. Weather was advantageous for all of the Drake Passage section. Problems and goals not achieved After three days of station work, a breakdown of the winch computer system was encountered. The ship managed to provide makeshift operation for the CTD/Rosette winch, and trawl winch operation was similarly resumed two days later. It was decided to continue the section, and to return to Ushuaia for repair thereafter. The section was ended at the break of the South Shetland Arc shelf off Smith Island. It consisted of 13 standard and 4 large-volume stations. However, the large-volume part in the Polar Frontal Zone was only done on the way back to Ushuaia, i.e. not simultaneous with the corresponding main CTD/Rosette work. Likewise on the way back, some CFM fill-in sampling was carried out. A related 39Ar station (Sta. 121) was only done away from the Drake Passage section proper. In total, at least four days were lost by the incident. After leaving Ushuaia (Feb. 2-3, 1990) again, station work was resumed on Feb. 6, 1990 with a short section north and east of the South Orkneys (Stas. 122- 131). From here on and up to the Bouvet Fracture Zone region the ship encountered icebergs and growlers regularly. After a further break, and after having rounded Southern Thule of the South Sandwich Islands, station work started once more on Feb. 12, 1990 near to the South Sandwich Trench, to be continued up to the African shelf (Stas. 132-179). These sections were again accompanied by XBT drops (30 to 45nm spacing). The cruise had been planned with some contingency time to allow for delays enforced by bad weather. Actually, only about 40 hours were spent for this. Hydrographic and even large-volume sampling work turned out to be feasible up to considerable wind force, i.e. 8. A larger part of the bad weather contingency was used for the winch repair, and some in the ship's speed having to be lowered on account of growlers (2-6 knots at night). One bad storm was encountered, however, on Feb. 20-21, 1990 with 90nm gusts and 17m waves, and some lesser storms before and after this event. Between there and Cape Town, a table tennis tournament and a cruise party brought a little variety to the somewhat monotonous station work. In total, we managed to complete also the second WOCE section adequately. It ended at the African shelf break late on Mar. 6, 1990. CFM measurements were unfortunately missed on four consecutive stations of this section because of a system breakdown. Starting from Sta. 165 (45.5°S), we ran two Rosette/CTD systems, which enabled us to obtain about 36 sampling depths per station. Whereas further south 24 depths appeared as adequate to resolve the hydrographic structure, higher vertical resolution was now regarded as relevant. A shallow rosette cast was done first, which rosette was sampled while the deep rosette cast (carrying the primary CTD instrument) was made. This procedure meant no more than about 45 min extra time per station. During the cruise, and particularly while two rosette/CTS systems were operated, a comparison was made of the AWI and Scripps-ODF data handling and operation procedures. The comparison looked favorable, although a detailed account of has yet to be made. METEOR entered Cape Town on the morning of Mar. 8, 1990. A historic remark: The German pre-war METEOR ran a cruise Ushuaia - Cape Town from Jan. 21 to March 10, 1926, which was cruise 5 of its famous South Atlantic survey. The scientific topic, i.e. hydrography, was quite similar. Stations totaled 34 (6 across Drake Passage), properties measured three (temperature, salinity, oxygen), and depths sampled were typically 26 (in three casts, naturally no continuous depth traces). Progress is slow after all. Data obtained Samples taken for shore-based measurement are listed in Table 4. The complete station list with some comment is given in Table 5. Data obtained aboard ship were quality-checked immediately, apart from the CFM data that were carefully evaluated and screened later on. A computerized bottle data list was set up. Working from it, sections were made using objective analysis with variable correlation length-scales (R. Schlitzer). A selection of these sections follows below. XBT temperature readings were corrected 0.25 K downward and depth upward (by 20 m at 300 m depth), according to comparisons with simultaneous CTD casts. Bucket and thermosalinograph temperatures were noted for each drop. Thermosalinograph readings were corrected upward by 0.05 ± 0.04 K and 0.33 ± 0.2 PSU. Drake Passage: Fig. 2-6 give sections of potential temperature, salinity, density, silicate, and CFM 11, respectively. Subantarctic front is found near Sta. 105, Polar Front near Sta. 112, and Scotia Front near Sta. 116. The Fig. 2-5 sections are similar to previous ones, whereas a CFM section (Fig. 6) was done for the first time. Fig. 6 shows that the Lower Circumpolar Deep Water, represented by the salinity maximum layer in Fig. 3, i.e. the presumed source of Warm Deep Water in the Weddell Sea (Sievers and Nowlin, 1984), is CFM-free when entering Drake Passage from the west. Orkney section: The CFM 11 section in Fig. 7 indicates higher concentrations in the Scotia Sea area (Sta. 126-128) than in the Weddell Basin (Sta. 129- 131). Section South Sandwich Trench and east: Potential temperature (Fig. 8), oxygen (Fig. 9), and silicate (Fig. 10) show relative extreme in the trench area (Sta. 133-135), and well correlated features (eddies, front meanders?) in the top 1000m. African Passage section: The hydrographic structure given in Figs. 11 and 12 is as expected from the literature (Witworth and Nowlin, 1987), but strong features related to the Agulhas retroflexion are apparent (Sta. 175ff). XBT and thermosalinograph sections are displayed in Figs. 13-15, and an XBT list is given in Table 6. Fig. 16 gives ALACE float motions Jan. - end of August, 1990. References: Bullister, J.L., and R.F. Weiss (1988): Determination of CCl3F and CCl2F2 and air. Deep-Sea Res., 35,839-853. Huber, B.A., et al. (1989): ANT V/2 CTD and Hydrographic Data, LDGO-89-3, Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades New York, 1989. Roether, W., M. Sarnthein, T.J. Muller, W. Nellen and D. Sahrhage (1990): Sudatlantik-Zirkumpolarstrom, Reise Nr. 11, 3. Oktober 1989 -11. Marz 1990. METEOR-Berichte, Universitat Hamburg, 90-2, 169 p. Sievers, H.A., and W.D. Nowlin (1984): The stratification and water masses at Drake Passage. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 10,489-10,514. Witworth, T., III, and W.D. Nowlin (1987): Water masses of the Southern Ocean at the Greenwich Meridian. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 6462-6476. Table 2: Principal Investigators for all measurements Parameter Institution PI CTD, Salinity AWI G. Rohardt, E. Fahrbach Nutrients, Oxygen ODF Scripps J. Swift, F. Delahoyde CFMs Uni Bremen W. Roether Tritium, 3He Uni Bremen W. Roether 14C (L-V & AMS) IUP Heidelberg P. Schlosser, K.O. Munnich 39Ar Uni Bern H.H. Loosli 85Kr LDGO W. M. Smethie CO2-Parameters LDGO D. Chipmann, T. Takahashi 226/228Ra Uni Prenceton R. Key IfM Kiel M. Rhein XBT, Thermosalinograph AWI U. Schauer, E. Fahrbach ADCP AWI E. Fahrbach CTD-intercomparison AWI/ODF Scripps G. Rohardt, F. Delahoyde ALACE Drifter SIO, Texas A&M R. Davis, W.D. Nowlin Table 3: Cruise Participants Name Responsibility Institution Roether, Wolfgang, Prof. Dr. Chief Scientist UBTO Arango, Jose Maria Observer IADO Beining, Peter CFM measurement UBTO Bulsiewicz, Klaus CFM measurement UBTO Ballegooyen, R. C.van Observer NRIO Bargen, D. van Meteorologist DWD Bos, David L. Nutrients ODF Breger, Dee CO2 LDGO Chipman, David W. CO2 LDGO Costello, James. P., Oxygen ODF Delahoyde, Frank M., CTD, data processing ODF Döscher, H.-J. Meteorology DWID Fraas, Gerhard Rosette, sampling UBTO Helas, G., Dr. Air chemistry MPCB Junghans, Christel 14C processing IUP Junghans, Hans-Georg 14C processing IUP Key, Robert M., Dr. Ra processing AOSP Legutke, Stefanie. CTD IFMH Nowlin, Worth D., Prof. Dr. Data analysis, ADCP TAMU Plep, Wilfried Rosette, sampling UBTO Putzka, Alfted, Dr. CFM measurement UBTO Ritschel, Kirstin 14C processing IUP Rohardt, Gerd CTD, data processing AWI Schlitzer, Reiner, Dr. Bottle data analysis UBTO Schlosser, Peter, Dr. L-V sampling LDGO Schauer, Ursel CTD, XBT AWI Schebeske, G. Air chemistry MPCB Theisen, Stefan Rosette, sampling UBTO Weppernik, Ralph 39Ar, 85Kr processing PIB Zaucker, Friedrich L-V sampling LDGO AOSP Program in Atmospheric & Oceanic Sci., Dept. of Geol. & Geophys. Sci., Princeton University, P. 0. Box CN 7 10, Princton, NJ 08544-07 1 0,USA AWI Alfred-Wegner-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Columbusstraße, 2850 Bremerhaven DWD Deutscher Wetterdienst, Seewetteramt, Postfach 301190, 2000 Hamburg 36 IADO Instituto Argentina de Oceanografia, Av. Alem 53, CP 8000 Bahia Blanca, Argentinien IFMH Institut für Meereskunde, Universität Hamburg, Troplowitzstr. 7, 2000 Hamburg 54 IUP Institut für Umweltphysik, Universidit Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 6900 Heidelberg LDGO Lamont - Doherty, Geological Observatory, Geochemstry Dept., Palisades, N.Y. 10964, USA MPCB Abteilung Biogeochemie, Max-Planck-Institut für Chernie, Postfach 3060, 6500 Mainz NRIO National Research Institute for Oceanology, CSIR, P. 0. Box 320, 7600 Stellenbosch, SUdafrika ODF Oceanographic Data Facility, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, U. Cal. S. D., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA PIB Physikalisches Institut der Universtät Bern, Bern, Schweiz TAMU Department of Oceanography, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3146, USA UBTO Universtät Bremen, FB, 1, Tracer-Ozeanographie, Postfach 330 440, 2800 Bremen 33 Table 4: Tracer samples taken for shore-based analysis The number of samples for each station is given. Columns (1) to (5): sampled by rosette; (6) - (10): by Gerards Stat. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nr. He Tri 13C/18O Ba 14C 14C 228Ra 226Ra 85Kr 39Ar 101 2 2 3 102 4 3 103 12 11 104 24 24 18 24 16 16 16 13 105 106 14 13 107 25 24 20 20 18 18 18 13 1 108 109 14 13 110 13 12 111 13 14 24 112 6 6 113 25 24 19 114 11 115 8 8 116 24 24 6 15 15 16 14 117 12 12 19 118 10 9 119 17 17 17 9 1 120 121 1 1 122 23 22 123 7 7 124 24 24 24 16 16 16 2 1 125 126 13 13 127 21 21 128 129 24 24 24 16 16 16 13 130 8 7 131 23 23 23 23 14 15 15 11 1 132 16 15 133 5 5 134 24 24 24 24 18 18 17 14 1 135 136 24 24 137 138 22 22 139 140 25 24 24 18 18 18 14 141 9 9 142 25 24 24 143 144 24 24 145 146 24 24 147 15 15 148 149 24 24 24 24 11 9 5 9 4 150 151 24 24 152 153 24 24 24 24 18 18 17 13 154 7 7 155 12 12 156 157 12 12 158 18 13 24 24 16 16 16 13 159 160 25 24 161 162 30 30 22 30 16 16 16 12 163 164 31 30 165 166 31 30 22 30 18 18 18 8 167 2 2 168 28 28 169 170 30 29 171 172 28 20 24 32 15 18 18 7 1 173 7 1 174 27 22 175 176 26 20 177 178 39 30 179 Table 5: Station Inventory Ship: METEOR (06-MT-cruise11, leg 5) WHP section S1/A21: Stas. 102 - 120 (suppl. 39Ar Sta.: 121) WHP section S2/A12: Stas. 149 - 179 Salinity, nutrients and oxygen were measured on all samples, and CFM's (11 and 12) on most. For other properties see Table 5. CO2 parameters (pCO2, Tot-CO2) were measured on virtually all stations, but to varying degree. Station/cast with non-normal operation (single bottle misfirings not noted): 101/1: trial station only, no samples 102/1: shelf station, some depth repeats 104/4: CFM blank check only (3500 - 4000 m) 109/1: winch computer breakdown followed after this cast 115/1: top 8 bottles misfired 118/1: at position of Sta. 115, to fill in above 1000 in depth; bottle-depth relation had to be rotated; CFM test 600 m 119/1+3:Gerard casts at position of Sta. 109 119/2: supporting rosette cast, samples below 500 m only; CFM test 2000 m 120/1: at position of Sta. 106; CFM test 3400 m 121/1: support for 39Ar cast, to 2400 m only 121/2: 39Ar cast to support Drake Passage section 122/1: some firing problems 135/1: bottle-depth relation had to be rotated 140/2: bottle-depth relation had to be rotated 154/1: very high sea 164/2: only even rosette positions were sampled, mix-up 10 and 100 in possible 165/1+2:delay between casts due to high sea 167/3: 39Ar cast in connection with L-V Sta. 166 173/3: 39Ar cast in connection with L-V Sta. 172 178/1: CFM check 900 m Table has one line per station, with data being arranged as follows: Sta. No. - cast/date type/latitude longitude/time - depth/CTD institution - "CTD#1" no. of rosette bottles fired Format of entries: - latitude and longitude in the degrees/min.fraction of min, at beginning of cast - time in UTC, beginning of cast - depth in m - AWI CTD #l: AWI instrument no. 1, ODF calibrated; AWI rosette 24 X 12 liter - SIO CTD #l: ODF instrument no. 1, Bremen rosette 24 X 10 liter streport 101 1230190 ROS5519.4S 6621.9W2021 71AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 102 1240190 ROS5619.8S 6759.7W0709 103AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 103 1240190 ROS5655.0S 6815.0W1232 3090AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 104 1240190 ROS5319.8S 6815.0W1900 4390AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 104 2250190 GER5720.8S 6804.7W0216 4391 104 3250190 ROS5720.0S 6814.7W0919 4390AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 105 1250190 ROS5750.1S 6814.5W2330 3757AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 106 1260190 ROS5820.1S 6814.3W0519 3855AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 107 1260190 GER5850.4S 6815.8W1032 3866 107 2260190 ROS5850.0S 6814.9W1443 3842AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 107 3260190 GER5849.8S 6815.3W1649 3823 108 1260190 ROS5919.9S 6814.8W2323 3665AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 109 1270190 ROS5949.9S 6815.0W0527 3738AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 110 1270190 ROS6019.8S 6808.0W1921 3818AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 111 1280190 ROS6049.9S 6800.0W0112 3954AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 112 2280190 ROS6112.9S 6719.8W1257 3849AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 113 1280190 ROS6135.9S 6640.3W1837 4013AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 114 1290190 ROS6200.0S 6559.1W0446 3587AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 115 1290190 ROS6216.9S 6512.7W0959 4083AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 116 1290190 GER6236.4S 6404.9W1603 3859 116 1290190 ROS6236.0S 6416.3W1920 4015AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 116 3290190 GER6235.8S 6406.7W2237 4025 117 1300190 ROS6251.4S 6331.5W0517 2099AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 118 1300190 ROS6217.0S 6513.0W1300 3860AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 119 1300190 GER6136.0S 6639.0W2020 3974 119 2010290 ROS6136.0S 6640.3W2353 3995AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 119 3310190 GER6136.2S 6640.5W0244 3760 120 1010290 ROS5820.1S 6815.3W0037 3855AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 121 1030290 ROS5529.4S 6429.1W2313 3642AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 121 2040290 GER5528.7S 6427.0W0025 3635 122 1060290 ROS5915.1S 4715.0W1233 3895AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 123 1060290 ROS6012.3S 4539.9W2203 3785AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 124 1070290 GER6041.7S 4153.9W1405 3946 124 2070290 ROS6039.1S 4156.1W1715 3978AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 124 3070290 GER6039.5S 4155.9W1935 4170 125 1080290 ROS6041.2S 4117.2W0344 2905AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 126 1080290 ROS6032.3S 3911.8W1211 3471AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 127 1080290 ROS6042.4S 3814.0W1701 2738AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 128 1080290 ROS6121.8S 3707.6W2336 3556AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 129 1090290 GER6123.9S 37 4.0W0232 4355 129 2090290 ROS6202.6S 3614.3W1046 4264AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 129 3090290 GER62 2.5S 3614.5W1252 4198 130 1090290 ROS6236.0S 3530.4W2003 4469AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 131 1100290 GER63 1.7S 3455.8W0137 4860 131 2100290 ROS6309.9S 3444.8W0445 5098AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 131 3100290 GER6310.6S 3444.7W0822 5104 132 1120290 ROS5906.6S 2537.2W0248 2524AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 133 1120290 ROS5843.0S 2440.9W0907 3448AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 134 1120290 GER5844.2S 24 3.8W1340 5464 134 2120290 ROS5844.0S 2404.0W1555 5413AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 134 3120290 GER5844.5S 24 3.5W2024 5491 135 1130290 ROS5842.6S 2322.7W0446 5551AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 136 1130290 ROS5835.5S 2224.7W1112 4769AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 137 1130290 ROS5827.0S 2120.5W1946 4580AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 138 1140290 ROS5822.1S 2009.2W0456 3420AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 139 1140290 ROS5808.2S 1819.9W1314 4485AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 140 1140290 GER5758.6S 1651.9W2049 5138 140 2140290 ROS5759.4S 1651.3W2307 5143AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 140 3150290 GER5758.7s 1652.0W0307 5155 141 1150290 ROS5748.1S 1524.9W1042 4541AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 142 1150290 ROS5739.1S 1317.6W1925 4235AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 143 1160290 ROS5731.9S 1155.5W0542 4766AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 144 1160290 ROS5723.4S 1002.4W1433 3949AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 145 1170290 ROS5714.9S 820.7W0022 3688AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 146 1170290 ROS5719.7S 635.4W0912 4225AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 147 1170290 ROS5749.1S 451.5W1708 4142AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 148 1180290 ROS5809.0S 306.2W0414 4321AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 149 1180290 ROS5829.9S 100.0W1301 4759AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 149 2180290 GER5829.8S 100.2W1745 4768 150 1190290 ROS5742.0S 025.0W0309 4101AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 151 1190290 ROS5659.9S 000.0E1037 3849AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 152 1190290 ROS5607.9S 037.6E1931 4157AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 153 1200290 GER5514.5S 109.4E0615 3423 153 2200290 ROS5515.2S 105.6E0757 4130AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 153 3200290 GER5514.4S 105.2E1216 4125 154 1210290 ROS5421.7S 145.1E1940 4890AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 155 1220290 ROS5331.0S 220.1E0557 3002AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 156 1220290 ROS5242.1S 249.9E1448 2910AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 157 1230290 ROS5152.6S 320.9E1034 3116AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 158 1230290 GER5108.9S 346.5E1853 3200 158 2230290 ROS5109.4S 347.1E2212 3170AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 158 3240290 GER5110.3S 346.6E0222 4139 159 1240290 ROS5025.1S 414.8E0853 2902AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 160 1240290 ROS4929.9S 445.0E1540 3574AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 161 1240290 ROS4841.6S 515.7E2329 3067AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 162 1250290 ROS4735.0S 549.3E0900 4321AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 162 2250290 GER4734.5S 550.0E1044 4283 162 3250290 ROS4734.2S 549.6E1153 4289AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 162 4250290 GER4735.0S 549.6E1610 4315 163 1260290 ROS4700.0S 640.0E0021 4093AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 164 1260290 ROS4609.6S 751.3E0938 3352AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 164 2260290 ROS4609.6S 751.0E1450 4055SIO CTD #1 24 bottles 165 1270290 ROS4534.9S 840.9E0254 4396SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 165 2270290 ROS4535.0S 841.0E1103 4394AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 166 1270290 ROS4453.2S 929.8E1835 4562AWI CTD #1 12 bottles 166 2270290 GER4453.6S 929.2E2050 5132 166 3270290 ROS4453.1S 930.1E2228 4563AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 166 4280290 GER4454.1S 930.3E0316 4562 167 1280290 ROS4357.0S 950.1E1033 4529SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 167 2280290 ROS4356.9S 951.0E1116 4539AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 167 3280290 GER4356.4S 949.5E1536 4507 168 1010390 ROS4301.7S 1007.6E0058 4047SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 168 2010390 ROS4300.0S 1007.3E0147 4091AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 169 1010390 ROS4157.9S 1025.1E0928 4448SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 169 2010390 ROS4156.9S 1023.4E1057 4534AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 170 1010390 ROS4103.0S 1044.0E2214 4417SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 170 2010390 ROS4103.1S 1044.6E2308 4420AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 171 1020390 ROS4006.9S 1103.8E0809 4727SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 171 2020390 ROS4006.6S 1103.2E0855 4731AWI CTD #1 12 bottles 172 1020390 ROS3907.0S 1119.8E1849 5051AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 172 2020390 GER3905.7S 1117.4E2219 5063 172 3020390 ROS3906.6S 1118.4E2247 5045AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 172 4030390 GER3906.0S 1116.3E0409 5065 173 1030390 ROS3837.2S 1222.2E1137 4838SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 173 2030390 ROS3837.1S 1222.9E1222 4764AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 173 3030390 GER3837.1S 1222.6E1258 4741 174 1030390 ROS3807.4S 1320.2E2230 5035SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 174 2030390 ROS3807.2S 1321.6E2327 5036AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 175 1040390 ROS3732.2S 1421.1E0724 4958SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 175 2040390 ROS3732.1S 1420.8E0816 4963AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 176 1050390 ROS3659.8S 1523.1E0504 4804SIO CTD #1 12 bottles 176 2050390 ROS3700.0S 1522.8E0617 4803AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 177 1050390 ROS3626.8S 1624.8E1706 4506AWI CTD #1 12 bottles 177 2050390 ROS3626.8S 1624.8E1845 4507AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 178 1060390 ROS3552.2S 1727.2E0332 3891AWI CTD #1 12 bottles 178 2060390 ROS3552.1S 1727.5E0556 3869AWI CTD #1 24 bottles 179 1060390 ROS3519.9S 1827.0E1855 1794AWI CTD #1 24 bottles Table 6: XBT-Stations METEOR 11/5 Date Time Station Latitude Longitude 1990 (GMT) Drake Passage (part A) 23.01. 2215 101 55 24.4 S 66 25.4 W 24.01. 0747 102 56 21.2 S 68 00.6 W 24.01. 0852 103 56 28.7 S 68 04.3 W 24.01. 0958 104 56 36.6 S 68 08.4 W 24.01. 1059 105 56 43.3 S 68 11.6 W 24.01. 1535 106 56 56.2 S 68 14.7 W 24.01. 1637 107 57 03.8 S 68 15.8 W 24.01. 1733 108 57 10.6 S 68 14.1 W 24.01, 1829 109 57 17.5 S 68 14.2 W 25.01. 1803 110 57 36.1 S 68 09.8 W 25.01. 1931 111 57 42.4 S 68 09.0 W 25.01. 2055 113 57 47.0 S 68 12.0 W 25.01. 2224 114 57 52.6 S 68 15.0 W 26.01. 0231 115 57 52.1 S 68 12.5 W 26.01. 0331 116 58 01.4 S 68 13.2 W 26.01. 0429 117 58 11.8 S 68 14.7 W 26.01. 0818 118 58 21.6 S 68 14.7 W 26.01. 0908 119 58 30.0 S 68 15.1 W 26.01. 0944 120 58 37.5 S 68 14.9 W 26.01. 1015 121 58 43.6 S 68 15.0 W 26.01. 1739 122 58 49.8 S 68 15.4 W 26.01. 2047 123 58 57.4 S 68 15.3 W 26.01. 2131 124 59 05.4 S 68 15.4 W 26.01. 2224 125 59 13.1 S 68 15.2 W 27.01. 0239 126 59 23.1 S 68 13.7 W 27.01. 0343 127 59 32.9 S 68 15.5 W 27.01. 0424 128 59 39.7 S 68 14.1 W 27.01. 0516 129 59 48.5 S 68 14.0 W 27.01. 1140 130 59 58.2 S 68 08.1 W 27.01. 1251 131 60 05.8 S 68 09.4 W 27.01. 1353 132 60 12.5 S 68 04.6 W 27.01. 1454 133 60 19.1 S 68 06.9 W 28.01. 0015 134 60 14.9 S 68 06.3 W 28.01. 0342 135 60 18.9 S 68 08.3 W 28.01. 0426 136 60 26.5 S 68 06.2 W 28.01. 0513 137 60 35.5 S 68 04.0 W 28.01. 0557 138 60 43.8 S 68 01.6 W 28.01. 1208 140 61 07.1 S 67 27.6 W 28.01. 1559 141 61 12.2 S 67 14.8 W 28.01. 1854 147 61 35.9 S 66 40.1 W 29.01. 0209 148 61 36.5 S 66 36.1 W 29.01. 0253 149 61 43.4 S 66 26.3 W 29.01. 0342 150 61 51.2 S 66 13.0 W 29.01. 0812 151 62 05.5 S 65 44.3 W 29.01. 0901 152 62 11.2 S 65 27.1 W 29.01. 1028 153 62 16.7 S 65 13.3 W 29.01. 1407 154 62 23.3 S 64 53.4 W 29.01. 1456 155 62 29.3 S 64 35.4 W 29.01. 2150 156 62 36.4 S 64 16.5 W 30.01. 0336 157 62 41.2 S 64 00.3 W 30.01. 0415 158 62 45.0 S 63 48.5 W 30.01. 0655 159 62 50.9 S 63 31.3 W 30.01. 0725 160 62 54.8 S 63 21.4 W 30.01. 0748 161 62 57.9 S 63 13.0 W 30.01. 0808 162 63 00.5 S 63 06.4 W 30.01. 0823 163 63 01.1 S 63 04.9 W South Orkney (part B) 6.02. 0918 164 59 04.1 S 48 08.4 W 6.02. 1057 165 59 09.6 S 47 45.2 W 6.02. 1243 166 59 15.2 S 47 14.8 W 6.02. 1626 167 59 22.3 S 47 00.6 W 6.02. 1745 168 59 34.0 S 46 44.5 W 6.02. 1853 169 59 45.1 S 46 25.2 W 6.02. 2000 170 59 56.3 S 46 06.6 W 6.02. 2116 171 60 09.1 S 45 47.8 W 6.02. 2210 172 60 12.3 S 45 40.0 W 6.02. 0940 173 60 29.9 S 43 37.8 W 6.02. 1032 174 60 31.6 S 43 17.7 W 6.02. 1141 175 60 33.9 S 42 50.0 W 6.02. 1257 176 60 37.4 S 42 20.1 W 6.02. 1722 177 60 39.1 S 41 56.3 W 7.02. 2336 178 60 38.9 S 41 53.2 W 8.02. 0146 179 60 42.0 S 41 33.0 W 8.02. 0402 180 60 41.5 S 41 16.8 W 8.02. 0735 181 60 36.3 S 40 48.0 W 8.02. 0839 182 60 32.3 S 40 22.4 W 8.02. 0946 183 60 27.4 S 39 56.8 W 8.02. 0958 184 60 27.4 S 39 56.8 W 8.02. 1534 185 60 36.3 S 38 44.9 W 8.02. 1541 186 60 36.9 S 38 41.3 W 8.02. 1642 187 60 40.6 S 38 21.7 W 8.02. 2025 188 60 56.0 S 37 51.7 W 8.02. 2152 189 61 07.2 S 37 30.8 W American-Antarctic Ridge (part C) 11.02. 2315 190 59 15.5 S 26 29.0 W 11.02. 0114 191 59 09.3 S 26 00.0 W 11.02. 0625 192 58 59.1 S 25 12.7 W 11.02. 0815 193 58 49.1 S 24 49.7 W 11.02. 0924 194 58 43.1 S 24 41.1 W 12.02. 0211 195 58 42.6 S 23 49.3 W 12.02. 0947 196 58 37.7 S 22 53.1 W 12.02. 1700 197 58 29.9 S 21 47.8 W 14.02. 0239 198 58 23.5 S 20 34.9 W 14.02. 1101 199 58 15.4 S 19 06.4 W 14.02. 1846 201 58 03.2 S 17 31.6 W 15.02. 0851 202 57 51.7 S 16 00.0 W 15.02. 1640 203 57 42.0 S 14 15.0 W 16.02. 0116 204 57 35.4 S 12 41.1 W 16.02. 1225 205 57 25.1 S 10 35.9 W 16.02. 2009 206 57 18.1 S 09 03.3 W 16.02. 0628 207 57 17.5 S 07 24.4 W 16.02. 1443 208 57 34.1 S 05 41.9 W 17.02. 2346 209 58 03.4 S 03 55.4 W 18.02. 1016 210 58 20.6 S 01 59.9 W 18.02. 2144 211 58 14.5 S 00 43.8 W NS-Section to Cape Town (part D) 19.02. 0026 212 57 58.1 S 00 37.0 W 20.02. 0030 216 55 50.5 S 00 45.4 E 20.02. 0301 217 55 33.6 S 00 56.4 E 20.02. 1605 218 54 58.6 S 01 17.8 E 20.02. 1843 219 54 40.0 S 01 32.6 E 22.02. 1140 220 53 10.2 S 02 33.1 E 22.02. 1304 221 52 57.8 S 02 40.2 E 22.02. 1304 222 52 57.8 S 02 40.2 E 22.02. 1925 223 52 23.2 S 03 01.9 E 22.02. 1925 224 52 23.2 S 03 01.9 E 22.02. 2108 225 52 08.6 S 03 11.3 E 23.02. 1422 226 51 38.8 S 03 32.3 E 23.02. 1557 227 51 23.2 S 03 41.2 E 24.02. 1239 228 50 03.4 S 04 28.2 E 51.02. 5003 229 50 03.4 S 04 28.2 E 24.02. 1407 230 49 48.1 S 04 36.2 E 24.02. 2016 231 49 06.2 S 04 59.8 E 24.02. 2124 232 48 54.2 S 05 07.8 E 25.02. 0351 233 48 20.2 S 05 30.2 E 25.02. 0705 234 47 49.7 S 05 42.2 E 25.02. 2033 235 47 20.1 S 05 59.2 E 25.02. 2243 236 47 12.4 S 06 22.9 E 26.02. 0507 237 46 43.7 S 07 03.5 E 26.02. 0717 238 07 25.5 S 46 27.6 E 26.02. 2039 239 45 59.1 S 08 06.8 E 26.02. 2340 240 45 47.6 S 08 24.0 E 27.02. 1557 241 45 17.4 S 09 01.9 E 27.02. 1706 243 45 05.8 S 09 14.3 E 27.02. 0720 244 44 43.5 S 09 36.8 E 27.02. 0851 245 44 16.6 S 09 43.1 E 27.02. 2158 246 43 35.9 S 09 56.6 E 28.02. 2321 247 43 19.3 S 10 00.9 E 1.03. 0601 248 42 37.2 S 10 14.5 E 1.03. 0734 249 42 18.5 S 10 18.7 E 1.03. 1727 251 41 45.7 S 10 29.1 E 1.03. 1932 251 41 21.9 S 10 37.6 E 2.03. 0415 252 40 44.0 S 10 51.6 E 2.03. 0606 253 40 26.7 S 10 57.5 E 2.03. 1447 254 39 46.7 S 11 13.6 E 2.03. 1706 255 39 26.0 S 11 21.3 E 3.03. 0830 256 38 55.8 S 11 41.6 E 3.03. 0959 257 38 46.7 S 12 02.9 E 4.03. 0536 258 37 43.4 S 14 01.1 E 4.03. 0536 259 37 43.4 S 14 01.1 E 4.03. 2109 260 37 27.0 S 14 41.7 E 4.03. 2318 261 37 17.1 S 14 51.6 E 5.03. 1253 262 36 14.8 S 15 47.0 E 5.03. 1253 263 36 14.8 S 15 47.0 E 5.03. 1438 264 36 26.9 S 15 57.6 E 5.03. 1515 265 36 26.3 S 16 06.0 E 5.03. 2330 266 36 15.4 S 16 46.1 E 6.03. 0113 267 36 06.9 S 17 06.4 E 6.03. 0356 268 35 53.2 S 17 27.4 E 6.03. 0955 269 35 42.5 S 17 48.9 E 6.03. 1246 270 35 29.9 S 18 07.1 E 6.03. 1904 271 35 20.0 S 18 27.1 E 6.03. 2225 272 35 12.6 S 18 35.9 E Figures are shown in pdf file. Fig. 1: Cruise track and stations (large dots: large volume stations), METEOR cruise 11/5 Fig. 2: Potential temperature section, Drake Passage, METEOR 11/5 (WOCE S1/A21). Station positions see Fig. 1 and Table 4. Isolines by objective analysis of original data (indicated by dots) by R. Schlitzer. Bottom depth from ships recordings. Fig. 3: same, salinity section. Fig. 4: same, density parameter, sigma-0 (0-1000 m),sigma-2 (1000-3000 m);sigma- 4 (3000-bottom) Fig. 5: same, silicate section. Fig. 6: same, CFM 11 section. The position of the lowest isoline, 0.025 pM, is somewhat uncertain, for being near to the data error of about 0.01 pmol/kg. Fig. 7: CFM 11 section, Orkney Stas. (Fig. 1), for explanation see Fig. 2. Fig. 8: South Sandwich trench and east, potential temperature section, Stas. see Fig. 1, for explanation see Fig. 2. Fig. 9: same, oxygen section. Fig. 10: same silica section. Fig. 11: African Passage section (WOCE S2/A12), potential temperature. Stas. see Fig. 1, for explanation see Fig. 2. Fig. 12: same, salinity section. Fig. 13: Map of XBT drops, some numbers are omitted for clarity. Fig. 14: XBT section, 0 to 700 m, in four parts as indicated in Fig. 13. Fig. 15: Thermosalinograph section, in three parts as indicated in Fig. 13. Fig. 16: Alace float trajectories, Jan. to end of August 1990. Vector displacements for 14 day period between dive and surfacing position are shown, coded for the individual floats; gap between vectors is surface time (24 h). Float rise velocity exceeds 1 km/h, descent starts at 700 m/h approaching zero at equilibrium depth. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- METEOR Cruise 1115, Ushuaia to Cape Town, 23 Jan. to 8 March 1990 Comment to Data Report submitted to WOCE WHP Wolfgang Roether, Univ. of Bremen, FB 1, 2800 Bremen 33, Germany This report refers to the METEOR bottle data, i.e., T, S, oxygen, nutrients, and CFM 11 and 12. Following is a brief explanation of the measurements and of the data table. Further explanation is offered in the Chief Scientist's cruise report. Measurements: Basic instrumentation was a 24 x 12 liter General Oceanics Rosette and a Neil Brown Mark IIIB CTD with oxygen sensor, both from the AWI, Bremerhaven. Pressure and temperature sensors were calibrated at SIO before the cruise and thereafter. During the cruise, the stability of the temperature and pressure sensors was monitored with reversing mercury and electronic thermometers and pressure gauges. The in-situ calibration of the conductivity and oxygen sensors was based on water samples from the Rosette, usually taken at 24 depth levels. Salinities were measured with a Guildline Autosal 8400A. 16 stations consist of two casts where samples in 36 depth levels have been taken. The shallow cast was carried out with a second 24 x 10 liter Rosette, with an identical CTD from Scripps/ODF. During the entire cruise, two different CDT data acquisition and processing systems were operated in parallel; one system from SIO, and one system from the AWL The processed data sets consist of 2 decibar pressure series. No major differences were found in processing techniques or the data sets. Nutrient and dissolved oxygen analysis was done by Scripps/ODF. Nutrient concentrations were analyzed colorimetrically using a 4-channel Technicon auto- analyzer system, one channel for each of NO2, NO3, PO4 and SiO3. No major problems were encountered in the analyses. Dissolved oxygen concentrations were analyzed using a modified Winkler titration method, again with no major problems. The data set quality was monitored by cross-checking the independent measurements for consistency. Malfunctioning or leaking Niskin bottles were identified. Due to tripping problems, the bottle-depth relation had to be rotated in a few instances, but the true relation was always unambiguous. Following is a description of the CFM measurements and an assessment of CFM data quality. CFM measurements: The measuring system employed is an automated variety of the Bullister and Weiss (Deep Sea Res., 1988) design. Water samples are taken in the common way using glass syringes. The system contains calibrated 30 ml water sample containers (Hastalloy C) connected to a 2 x 8 multiposition GC valve (Vici-Valco), into which samples are introduced (upward displacement) through a regular GC valve manually. For measurement, container content is automatically transferred into the extraction burette by a flow of carrier gas (downward displacement). All valves are air- actuated. Temperature of the collection trap is forced by Peltier cooling/heating. Carrier gas purge (separately for GC and sample processing parts of the system) uses two lines each, of which one is back-flushed at higher temperature with a small flow of purified gas. System control and data handling is provided by a PC. It has peak integration installed for quick data inspection, but final peak evaluation occurred off-line by fitting Gaussians to the data. Calibration used compressed air from a tank, the CFM concentrations of which were later on calibrated by comparison with gas standards provided by R. F. Weiss, Scripps. This was the first time that the system was used at sea, which led to some modification of procedures during the cruise. In general, the system and in particular the automation operated well. Some outliers (more than we had hoped) were observed, the cause of which was not always clear. A substantial blank was encountered in the beginning. However, the sample preparation line blank was quite stable and indistinguishable between water sample containers, as well as from the lowest values obtained in sample measurement. This showed that a sampling blank was negligible within errors, and at the same time gave proof of vanishingly low concentrations. A special cast was made early on into supposedly CFM-free water to compare different sets of Niskin bottles available, of which one was found contaminated. To monitor detection efficiency, gas standards were run regularly, and full calibration runs repeatedly (non-linearity was rather larger than usual). Sta. 145 was omitted, and four stations (Sta. 162 -165) were missed when water accidentally went beyond the extraction burette. The calibration curve was substantially different after this incident. The data have been post-processed carefully and an error analysis has been made. The data blank was taken to be the sample preparation line blank, agreement between which and the lowest-concentration samples (see above) being found both at the beginning of the cruise (Drake Passage section) and towards the end (Cape Basin stations). Precision/accuracy estimates (standard errors throughout) were made considering the following error contributions (found to be similar for CFM 11 and 12): - blank uncertainty (± 0.01 pmol/kg); - sample replicate precision (about ± 1% for high concentrations); - standard interpolation uncertainty (about ± 1.5%); - uncertainty of calibration curve (<- ± 0.5%); - uncertainty by drift in non-linearity (<- ± 0.5%); - calibration uncertainty relative to the Scripps CFM scale (± 0.3%; ignoring any drift between the time of measurements at sea and the calibration later on). By error propagation, the overall accuracy (relative to Scripps) is obtained as ± 2% or 0.01 pmol/kg, whichever is greater. The calibration data points were fitted by a third order polynomial. The highest CFM 11 concentrations were outside the calibration range (by at most 40%). The polynomial was extrapolated towards higher concentrations and the uncertainty of the extrapolation was calculated from the fit. The added uncertainty due to the extrapolation is calculated to be ±2% for the maximum CFM 11 concentrations (about 6 pmol/kg), for which the total error thus becomes ± 3%. Gas standard runs (temperature and pressure corrected) were fitted (in sections) by a straight line, and the standard interpolation uncertainty (apparently the largest error contribution, see above) is the standard deviation around such fit. Standard deviation among gas standards run consecutively was much smaller (about ±0.3%). This suggests that detection efficiency varies substantially on a time scale of several hours. Had gas standard runs been made somewhat more often and more regularly, it might have been possible to monitor these variations and reduce the overall error substantially. The CFM 11 and 12 errors transform into a CFM 11/12 ratio error of ±3% for large concentrations, rising to about 3.5% for CFM 11 approaching 6 pmol/kg. As a consequence of the blank uncertainty (±0.01 pmol/kg), at 0.05 pmol/kg in CFM 12 the ratio error exceeds ±20%. The data were screened as follows. Firstly, those data were removed for which samples or handling were considered faulty (e.g. samples from contaminated Niskins, see above). Secondly, CFM station profiles were inspected and compared to those of other properties, which led to rejection of just a few data considered as clearly unreasonable judging from the hydrographic structure. Thirdly, measurements were checked for CFM 11/12 ratio consistency. Those data that have ratios that differ significantly from a reasonable value (estimated from the general distribution of ratios), have been flagged in the data tables; the flag means that we believe one of the two CFM numbers to be faulty. The CFM data of Stas. 122 to 139 have larger uncertainties and contain more outliers. The suspected cause of this is a leak in the 2 x 8 multiposition valve. It looks as if some sample degassing in the water sample containers may have occurred, effected by a small amount of carrier gas leaking through. If this interpretation is correct, measured concentrations should be on the low side for these stations, and, due to different solubility, more so for CFM 12 than for CFM 11. Such interpretation is supported by a comparison of surface water concentrations with values corresponding to solubility equilibrium with atmospheric concentrations, as wen as by profile information (i.e., high-ratio values tend to be low in the profiles). The flagged data for these stations may be low in CFM 12 by up to about 25% (10% for CFM 11), and there may be a general bias towards low values believed to be at most about 10% in CFM 12 (5% in CFM 11). Tables: The data are given on diskette, only sample tables being included below. The data are organized as follows: The main data table (files: station#.dat; directory \meteor11\btldat) is largely self-explanatory and contains all data except the CFMs. Additionally CTD corrections are listed, and comment on specific data is given were appropriate (see sample table 118.dat for Sta. 118). The CFM data are contained in a second table (file: station#.hyf; directory \meteor11\btlcfm) that lists the basic measurements without a heading, the last three additional columns being CFM 11, CFM 12, and CFM 11/12 ratio; flagged CFM data (see above) are indicated by a negative ratio. Missing data are indicated by "-1.00000E+10". For identification of the different parameters see enclosed sample table "station I 18.hyf". 118.dat Hydro Data Report 09-Mar-90 06:47 METEOR-11/5 F/S METEOR 2 LEG 01 STATION 118 CAST 01 62 17.0 S LAT 65 13.0 W LON 30-Jan-90 13:00 DEPTH: 3860 ROS AWI CTD #1 24 bottles SAMP DEPTH PRESS TEMP SALT POT TEMP SIGMA0 SIGMA2 SIGMA4 DISS O2 NO2 NO3 PO4 SiO3 NUM (M) (db) (DEG C) (PSU) (DEG C) (UM/KG) (UM/KG) (UM/KG) (UM/KG) (UM/KG) 114 5 4.6 3.614 33.875 3.613 26.930 36.058 44.780 325 0.30 23.1 1.60 18.9 113 42 42.4 2.261 33.825D 2.259 27.010 36.212 45.003 350 0.21 25.1 1.82 24.1 112 111 112.1 -1.121 33.991 -1.123 27.340 36.736 45.709 345 0.19 27.6 1.99 33.8 111 171 173.0 0.619 34.231D 0.611 27.451 36.740 45.611 254 0.01 33.1 2.27 55.8 110 220 222.3 1.582 34.393 1.571 27.518 36.749 45.567 213 0.00 34.8 2.38 67.3 109 289 291.5 1.909 34.478 1.894 27.562 36.773 45.573 192 0.00 35.1 2.40 74.1 108 397 400.9 1.912 34.542 1.890 27.614 36.824 45.623 185 0.00 34.9 2.39 79.1 107 486 491.0 2.019 34.613 1.992 27.662 36.866 45.658 178 0.00 34.5 2.34 83.4 106 486 491.0 2.019 34.613D 1.992 27.662 36.866 45.659 105 486 491.0 2.019 34.613D 1.992 27.662 36.866 45.659 104 584 590.2 2.018 34.651D 1.984 27.694 36.897 45.690 103 584 590.2 2.018 34.651D 1.984 27.694 36.897 45.690 102 588 594.2 2.018 34.652D 1.984 27.694 36.897 45.690 101 588 594.2 2.018 34.652D 1.984 27.694 36.897 45.690 124 588 594.2 2.018 34.652D 1.984 27.694 36.897 45.690 0.00 33.4 2.30 87.0 123 589 595.2 2.018 34.651 1.984 27.693 36.897 45.689 178 0.00 33.4 2.29 86.7 122 693 700.3 1.978 34.684 1.938 27.723 36.929 45.723 179 0.00 32.8 2.24 89.0 121 833 842.9 1.919 34.708 1.870 27.748 36.957 45.755 183 0.00 32.4 2.21 91.9 120 1036 1048.4 1.768 34.727 1.707 27.776 36.994 45.799 189 0.00 31.9 2.18 96.4 Cast 1 CTD corrections: p = p + ( 0) *p*p*p + ( 0) *p*p + ( 0)*p + ( 0) *t*t + ( 0)*t + ( 0) t = t + ( 0) *p*p + ( 0) *p + (0.000019648) *t*t + ( -0.0011801)*t + ( -2.9894) c = c + ( 0) *p*p + ( -8.35795e-07)*p + ( 0) *t*t + ( 0)*t + ( 0) *c*c + (-0.0000807591)*c + (0.0262089) s = s + ( 0) *p*p + ( 0)*p + ( 0) *t*t + ( 0)*t + ( 0) *s*s + ( 0)*s + ( 0) Preliminary data -- not for publication. End of Report. ================================================= 111 salt deleted because of CTD difference 113 salt deleted because of CTD difference 118.hyf Depth [m] T in situ [°C] Sal [psu] O2 [µmol/kg] NO3 [µmol/kg] PO4 [µmol/kg] SiO3 CFM-11 CFM-12 CFM11/CFM12 [µmol/kg] [pmol/kg] [pmol/kg] Ratio 5.00000E+00 3.61400E+00 3.38750E+01 3.25000E+02 2.31000E+01 1.60000E+00 1.89000E+01 5.53640E+00 2.44050E+00 2.26855E+00 4.20000E+01 2.26100E+00 3.38250E+01 3.50000E+02 2.51000E+01 1.82000E+00 2.41000E+01 6.62740E+00 2.73100E+00 2.42673E+00 1.11000E+02 -1.12100E+00 3.39910E+01 3.45000E+02 2.76000E+01 1.99000E+00 3.38000E+01 6.44310E+00 2.66410E+00 2.41849E+00 1.71000E+02 6.19000E-01 3.42310E+01 2.54000E+02 3.31000E+01 2.27000E+00 5.58000E+01 3.09110E+00 1.35070E+00 2.28852E+00 2.20000E+02 1.58200E+00 3.43930E+01 2.13000E+02 3.48000E+01 2.18000E+00 6.73000E+01 1.65630E+00 7.42500E-01 2.23071E+00 2.89000E+02 1.90900E+00 3.44780E+01 1.92000E+02 3.51000E+01 2.40000E+00 7.41000E+01 9.77100E-01 4.43300E-01 2.20415E+00 3.97000E+02 1.91200E+00 3.45420E+01 1.85000E+02 3.49000E+01 2.39000E+00 7.91000E+01 7.18100E-01 3.23100E-01 2.22253E+00 4.86000E+02 2.01900E+00 3.46130E+01 1.78000E+02 3.45000E+01 2.34000E+00 8.34000E+01 3.69900E-01 1.67600E-01 2.20704E+00 4.86000E+02 2.01900E+00 3.46130E+01 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 2.51300E-01 1.08000E-01 2.32685E+00 4.86000E+02 2.01900E+00 3.46130E+01 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 2.41600E-01 1.12600E-01 2.14565E+00 5.84000E+02 2.01800E+00 3.46510E+01 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 2.42700E-01 1.19700E-01 2.02757E+00 5.84000E+02 2.01800E+00 3.46510E+01 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 2.47100E-01 1.12300E-01 2.20036E+00 5.88000E+02 2.01800E+00 3.46520E+01 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1-00000E+10 2.43500E-01 1.22500E-01 1.98776E+00 5.88000E+02 2.01800E+00 3.46520E+01 -1.00000E+10 -1-00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 -1.00000E+10 2.41700E-01 1.06700E-01 2.26523E+00 5.88000E+02 2.01800E+00 3.46520E+01 -1.00000E+10 3.34000E+01 2.30000E+00 8.70000E+01 2.44800E-01 1.08100E-01 2.26457E+00 5.89000E+02 2.01800E+00 3.46510E+01 1.78000E+02 3.34000E+01 2.29000E+00 8.67000E+01 2.51900E-01 1.17300E-01 2.14749E+00 6.93000E+02 1.97800E+00 3.46840E+01 1.79000E+02 3.28000E+01 2.24000E+00 8.90000E+01 1.58900E-01 7.15000E-02 2.22238E+00 8.33000E+02 1.91900E+00 3.47080E+01 1.83000E+02 3.24000E+01 2.21000E+00 9.19000E+01 9.60000E-02 5-50000E-02 1.74545E+00 1.03600E+03 1.76800E+00 3.47270E+01 1.89000E+02 3.19000E+01 2.18000E+00 9.64000E+01 5.87000E-02 4.32000E-02 1.35880E+00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Birgit Klein Cruise M11/5: Expocode 06MT11/5 The cruise covers partly the sections A21 (101-120), S4 (121-148) and SR02 (149- 179). CFCs: CFCs are measured directly on the ship using a electron capture detector (ECD) packed column gas chromatograph. The column was filled with Porasil C and Porapak T. Only f11 and f12 have been measured during the cruise. Part of the original documentation as been lost, information on system blanks and air measurements is unfortunately not available. The original measurements have been recorded on the sio86 scale and have latter been converted to sio93. Contamination problems and calibration problems are reflected in the relatively high errors. Quality flag for CFCs follow woce standards: * 2 good measurement * 3 questionable measurement * 4 bad measurement * 5 not reported * 6 replicate sample * 9 no sample drawn errors: sta. f11 f12 102-117 2% or 0.01 pmol/kg 2% or 0.01 pmol/kg 118-161 3% or 0.01 pmol/kg 2% or 0.01 pmol/kg 166-179 2% or 0.01 pmol/kg 2% or 0.01 pmol/kg Tritium: Tritium is sampled in 1 l glas bottles which are analyzed after the cruise in the laboratory at Bremen. Tritium is measured through the in-growth of helium3 from the radioactive decay. For the procedure the water samples are degassed and transferred to special glas containers which are sealed off and placed into freezers. After a storage time of 6 month to about a year to allow the in- growth of sufficient amounts of helium3 the samples are measured with the noble gas spectrometer described below. A large number of tritium samples have been contaminated on the ship and could not be recovered. They have been identified by quality flag 5. A smaller number of samples had been contaminated during measurement procedures in the lab and has been retrieved through a second extraction. These samples have been assigned quality flag 6 although they are not strictly replicate samples. Each measurement has been assigned an individual error. Tritium concentrations are scaled to 15 February 1990. Helium and Neon: 40 ml water samples are filled into copper tubes at sea which are pinched off. In the laboratory the gas amount is vacuum extracted from the sample and transferred to a specialized helium/ neon isotope mass spectrometer. The noble gas mass spectrometer is no commercial unit but has been specially designed at the University of Bremen. It contains two commercial units: a quadro-pole mass spectrometer (Balzer QMG 112) and a sector field (Mass Analyzer Products, type 215). Two helium isotopes 3He, 4He and two Neon isotopes 20Ne, 22Ne are measured. Air aliquots provide the instrument calibration and monitor sensitivity changes. An internal standard filled with regular air has been used for the helium isotope and neon measurements at the lab in Bremen to make all measurements internally self-consistent. An external standard does not exist. Helium data have been corrected for tritium decay during storage although the correction is very small due to the low tritium concentrations in the southern ocean. It is at maximum 0.5% and effects mostly upper waters. Helium and neon measurements have been assigned individual errors. ----------------------------------- *** THIS IS ONLY A README FILE! *** ----------------------------------- WOCE Sections Covered A21, S4, SR2 This cruise so far does not have any documentation associated with the data. Note the different Temperature scales in the .ctd(ITS-68) and .hyd(ITS-90) files. KJ 5 Dec 1994 The cruise ID was changed from 06MT011-5 to 06MT11-5. Added TCARBN and PCO2 in .hyd file. KJ 23 Feb 95